Saturday, January 25, 2020

The Limits of Liberalism

“The Potlikker Papers - Food History of the Modern South” by John T. Edge, 2017

This is basically a foodie’s guide to the U.S. South, with a garnish of politics on the side.  It is mostly a form of apolitical cultural tub thumping common to upscale Southern liberals.  It starts with a number of interesting chapters that link the civil rights movement with food and one about rural hippies on “The Farm” bringing the vegan to Tennessee.  Then as the myth goes, after the 1978 election of Carter the ‘New South’ was born (once again) and politics and economics disappeared.  Negatives are now just ‘stereotypes.’  The book becomes a long boosterish litany of southern restaurants and roadhouses, chefs, culinary teachers and food writers.  It reads like an advertising article from any local newspaper praising the latest restaurant opening. In the process Edge almost claims Southern ownership of the farm-to-table food movement.  Only at the end does the author wake up after the Paula Deen scandal and realize that food is STILL intertwined with politics and economics in the South.  As it is anywhere.

Suffering from some kind of inferiority complex, pro-Southern culture professors and pundits seem to have a serious blind spot when it comes to politics, economics, statistics or quality-of-life gauges. They dwell on their mint juleps and shrimp and grits and their next visit to a new restaurant.  Edge himself seems to be for local and non-industrial foodways, which is certainly progressive.  But then he celebrates Memphis ribs being Fed Exed across the country.  He’s against industrial farming but has an enthusiastic chapter on many of the fast food chains that came out of the South, led by Kentucky Fried Chicken but which includes Hardees, Burger King, Wendy’s, Chik fil-A, Long John Silver’s, Popeye’s, Schlotsky’s and others.  He says at one point that vegetables are the heart of southern cooking, then has involved chapters on artisanal pork and dry-rub barbecue pork.  He understands that food involves health, but then ignores the idea.  He never covers organic food, agro-ecology or sustainability.  So it is hard to know what he actually believes other than Southern promotion.  In that sense he comes across as the breathless professional P.T. Barnum or Babbitt of ‘southern foodways.’  As he puts it, food unites the South. I’ll put it another way.  Food unites humanity.

Edge’s early chapters are interesting.  As radicals like Fannie Lou Hamer might have said, “you can’t eat ballots.”  A founder of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, she later started local co-op farms that provided fresh vegetables and pork to starving African American’s in the Mississippi Delta.  Edge profiles a home cook in Montgomery, Alabama who fed Civil Rights activists like King and others in her house restaurant.  He talks about a heroic waiter in a ‘white gentry’ restaurant in Greenwood, Mississippi who frankly talked to the national media about racism and got fired for it.  He reminds us of the Black Panther Party’s breakfast program, which provided healthy and nutritious food, not chips and soda.  He also reminds us that many left-wing black nationalists opposed ‘soul food’ due to its negative health impacts.  In these chapters he does not forget that segregation’s intention was to hurt and exploit African-American labor, land and businesses.

Paula Deen’s racist 2013 comments as she cooked black-created food knocks Edge out of his food coma.  Deen was a ridiculous southern TV cook who substituted doughnuts for bread in sandwiches, displaying an unhealthy sweets fetish that is common in southern foods.  African-Americans brought rice, black-eyed peas, okra, watermelons, Kola nuts (first used in Coca-Cola), coffee, kidney and lima beans and yams to the Americas.  The book’s title comes from potlikker, the healthy broth left in the master's pot that slaves used for their own cooking.  Corn, the main ingredient of grits, cornbread, bourbon, some whiskies and hominy, was a south-eastern Native American food, as are peanuts, squash, sweet potatoes and others.  Edge claims southern cooking originated from black female cooks on plantations or private homes – though those many Southerners without slaves or without servants must have eaten something! His references to Appalachian cooks might provide an answer.

Of most theoretical interest is Edge’s description of a nationalist and patriotic debate over what is ‘American’ food.  He ignores the fact that the Americas stretch from Tierra Del Fuego to the Arctic, so the U.S. cannot appropriate the name for itself.  Edge describes how many southern chefs imitated the dreaded French, then except for the ones from New Orleans, shouldered them away for more patriotic dishes.  Edge vacillates between nationalist tub-thumping for a ‘brawny’ American cuisine of certain designated dishes (barbecue!) while dissing fusion - and realizing that a nation of immigrants, including African-Americans, makes it inevitable that fusion cuisines exist.  The problem with fusion is that local food cannot include slave-grown avocados from Mexico or exotic ingredients from everywhere, so only melding the two ideas will be environmentally possible. 

Picking green tomatoes in Florida

In the second to the last chapter Edge regains an edge by commenting on the slave-labor conditions for Latino workers in chicken processing plants and in Florida tomato fields.  The South hosts 3 of the top 4 chicken producers.  But in the process he’s praised right-to-work laws, corporate welfare and how Reagan helped the South “colonize” the nation.  As I said, they have a very large blind-spot.

Southern regionalism as not imagined by Edge is actually different than many other U.S. regionalisms given the peculiar nature of the South’s long history and its continued role as the most politically backward area in the U.S.  There is no new South, unlike the post-Carter propaganda of the Southern professional class and in spite of the proliferation of cul-de-sacs and skyscrapers.  There is a newer, updated version of the ‘old South’ that has changed its clothes and has still not been defeated.

On a personal note, I’ve had a platter of 40 crayfish in a restaurant on Bourbon Street.  I’ve eaten tasteless shrimp and grits in Athens.  I’ve eaten at the touristy ‘southern’ restaurants in Charleston.  ‘Southern’ food for the most part is heavy, greasy food, light on the vegetables – rural comfort food really. I avoid it except for the excellent cuisine in New Orleans.  There is no doughnut like a beignet I gaur-ron-tee!

Other prior reviews on this topic, use blog search box, upper left:  “Southern Cultural Nationalism,” “The Neo-Confederate States,” “Florida Will Sink,” “Monroe, Alabama & To Kill a Mockingjay,” “Salt Sugar Fat,” “Foodopoly,” “Mastering the Art of Soviet Cooking,” “A Foodies Guide to Capitalism,” “Behind the Kitchen Door,” “The Italian Brand,” “What is the Matter With the Rural U.S.?” “A Redder Shade of Green.”

And I got it gratis at Normal Books, Athens Georgia

The Cranky Yankee
January 25, 2020    

No comments: