Minneapolis Institute of Art (‘MIA’) –
‘State of the Art – Discovering American Art Now’
Ever wondered what the art world is
doing or where it is going? Tired of
reading about high prices at Art Basel or at Sothebys? Wondering if art will ever be relevant to
working-class people again?
I’ve asked myself some of these same
questions. This show provides one of the
answers, and it’s not limited to Minnesota. Organized by the Museum
of American Art in Bentonville Arkansas, this show is a
cross-section of 130 artworks by more than 50 pretty much unknown artists. Bentonville of course is the headquarters of
Wal-Mart, the retail death-star; and anti-union Delta is the show’s major
sponsor – probably part of their PR
campaigns to the liberal professional strata who frequent the MIA.
That said, the curators claim that 2
million people in the U.S.
are artists. This is significant, for it
shows that ‘art’ is not just an elite preoccupation anymore. Since the Renaissance, when a handful of people
called themselves artists, to Paris
in the times of Impressionism where 2,000 registered artists lived in the city, artists have been a marginal strata. Today it is a mass activity. In Minneapolis there is even an ‘art crawl’ in some
neighborhoods, and this is probably true all over the U.S. This show makes the usual tired nods to
‘diversity’ – even in its’ promo cover shot – but it showcases an amateur art
world in which no art ‘movement’ exists.
Each artist is following their own obsession through various mediums – sculpture with balsa wood, birds dressed in clothing, paintings, ink drawings, digital art based on skin, films of various kinds, found objects; recycled pieces made with corks, painted fabric, lottery tickets; much photography, immersive pieces, fabric constructions, fabric wrapped around combs, ceramics and porcelain, melted plastic, collage, what have you.
Each artist is following their own obsession through various mediums – sculpture with balsa wood, birds dressed in clothing, paintings, ink drawings, digital art based on skin, films of various kinds, found objects; recycled pieces made with corks, painted fabric, lottery tickets; much photography, immersive pieces, fabric constructions, fabric wrapped around combs, ceramics and porcelain, melted plastic, collage, what have you.
The themes are also over the
map. There is a bit of politics – a
picture of an abandoned mall; environmental messages; the enslavement of black
people, little recreations of buildings destroyed in Iraq and Syria, references
to Animal Farm – but most of it is again, individual obsessions. This reflects the whole capitalist economy,
in which individuated people follow their tiny passions. Each artist becomes an entrepreneur, selling
themselves and their somewhat narrow talent as a commodity. In addition, art has become part of the
‘peddler’ economy in which money is earned on the side to supplement meager
wages. Today most varieties of isolated
artists avoid any interaction with social movements or history. Sad but true.
Folk art and ostensible ‘fine art’
are also all mashed together. This might
all be called ‘post-modernism’ but I don’t think it is because it still follows
a certain pattern. What is that pattern?
What is happening is the
democratization of art. That is the
pattern. Karl Marx pointed out in his
younger days that socialism and later communism would free people from the
tyranny of excessive labor in order to allow workers to grow and develop other
skills – cultural, athletic, mechanical.
Socialism he felt would be the full transition from the ‘realm of
necessity’ to the ‘realm of freedom.’ In
this vision, many or all people would become artists – or musicians,
writers, builders, inventors, sewers, software developers, great cooks,
gardeners – all the thing people in the U.S. pursue, but currently in a
somewhat limited way.
Whether this also leads artists in the present day to actually forming artistic ‘movements’ that unite with social struggles is probably also inevitable, as individuation ultimately becomes a sterile approach.
Whether this also leads artists in the present day to actually forming artistic ‘movements’ that unite with social struggles is probably also inevitable, as individuation ultimately becomes a sterile approach.
This democratization is happening
across the cultural board, not just among artists. In the U.S., the massive amount of musicians in Minneapolis, the thousands of actors in Los
Angeles, the writers crowding New York
(or perhaps who used to crowd New
York…) - are creating an overflow of creativity,
‘content’ and ‘product.’ The consequence is that there is now massive amounts
of everything - not just cereal but
cultural products. But there is still a
bifurcation of this production – a 1% or 10% that can earn a living and a 90%
that does occasionally, in their spare time, or that never earns enough to make
a real living and scrapes by. ‘Don’t
quit your day job,’ as they say. Yet
this situation presages a completely different kind of ‘art world’ which is
totally alienated from the high-bucks commodification that we see of
Impressionism or Picasso or Abstract Expressionism by capital’s art market. A
commodification that has now even reached street art, much to the dismay of
Banksy.
Under socialism, the added amount of
free time enjoyed would allow this flowering of talent. But even other capitalism, there is now more
free time in some more social-democratic countries or among some strata than in the past. This allows the ordinary population to become
more creative. This is what we are
seeing when we see a number like ‘2 million’ artists in the U.S. – it is not just a reflection of the poverty
of the job market. In essence what is
happening even under capital is the development of socialist cultural values
‘in the egg,’ foreshadowed. This
situation prefigures a world where food, clothing, health care, education and
shelter are givens – no longer the main goals of life, but automatic. Then human beings can become fully human, not
just wage slaves or animals grubbing for their daily bread.
Indeed, artists won't become millionaires or lauded by the rich anymore. That will be the new paradigm. Art and creativity will instead become widespread - it will be democratic. The government or society will instead support the arts in a way that they do not now.
Indeed, artists won't become millionaires or lauded by the rich anymore. That will be the new paradigm. Art and creativity will instead become widespread - it will be democratic. The government or society will instead support the arts in a way that they do not now.
The show at the MIA runs From Feb 18 to May 22.
Reviews on prior art shows or
books. Use some of these terms to find them: “The Influence of Picasso,”
“The Art of Frida Kahlo,” “Art Crawl in Northeast Minneapolis,” “London:
The Death of Art,” “9.5 Thesis on Art’ and “Banksy.”
Red Frog
May 13, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment