“War With Russia? From Putin & Ukraine to Trump &
Russiagate,” by Stephen Cohen, 2019
This book is a series of somewhat
repetitive blog posts between 2014-2018 opposing the new Cold War between the U.S. and Russia. Cohen was at one time a prominent historian,
Russia scholar, journalist and academic who promoted ‘détente’ between the USSR and the U.S. He now laments that there is
almost no force in the U.S. – in either Party, in the captive media, in the
national security state, even among the capitalist class – that wants a normal
‘big power’ relationship between the two nuclear nations. He targets U.S.
aggressiveness as the cause of the ‘new’ Cold War. Cohen quit the Council on Foreign Relations
in 2018 after they endorsed the new Cold War against Russia. Like Chris Hedges, he is another refugee from
the increasingly narrow ruling intelligentsia in the U.S.
It Can't Happen Here |
Cohen is a past sympathizer of
Nicolai Bukharin’s, but this book is not couched in ideological terms, or indeed
any Marxist terms at all. It ignores the
growing ‘cold war’ with China,
or the capitalist economic & imperialist rationales behind the demonization
of Putin, of Russians or of Russian foreign policy. But he does see the New Cold war and
Russiagate as the policies of U.S.
elites, not the population. Surveys show
that a large majority of U.S.
citizens want better relations with Russia. However, the opinions of the population have
no role in the foreign policy of the U.S. government. Cohen thinks Trump is about the only barrier to
even more severe actions that might bring a wider conflict. Trump has been pressured into increasing hostility
in response to the Russiagate claims, though he ran as a ‘détente’ candidate.
The new Cold war is actually a product of aggression
by the U.S.
security state and its wider military wing, NATO. These are its roots:
A. Now copious public documentation shows that
the U.S.
and NATO made promises to Gorbachev in 1990 that NATO would not move
‘one inch further east.’ At present, Georgia, Ukraine
and the Baltic countries are either in NATO or getting NATO aid – all on the
border with Russia. Tallinn in Estonia is 198 air miles from St. Petersburg.
B. George Bush unilaterally canceled the
ABM nuclear treaty with Russia
in 2002.
C. The U.S.
and NATO backed an early Georgian proxy-war with Russia in 2008 over South
Ossetia on the Russian border.
D. In 2011 Obama made promises to Russia that Russian
ally Gaddafi would not be deposed in NATO’s regime change plans. A lie, celebrated by Hillary Clinton.
E. The U.S and NATO backed a militarized regime
change coup against the elected and corrupt president of Ukraine in 2014. The shootings in Maidan Square were
actually carried out by the Right Sector – then blamed on the government. The final push came from armed ultra-right and
neo-fascist Ukrainian groups like the Right Sector and the Banderist Svoboda
Party, who installed another corrupt oligarch, still in power today.
F. The U.S.
has ignored the Minsk Agreement between Ukraine, Russia
and the EU, which would have de-militarized Ukraine,
allowed some home rule for Donbass and agreed to Ukraine having economic ties with
east and west.
G. The 2014 ‘annexation’ of Crimea
was by an overwhelming popular vote of its nearly all-Russian ethnic
population. This in the face of
anti-Russian ethnic laws and terror by the new Kiev
coup government, including a massacre of pro-Russian protesters in Odessa. It was actually
similar to what the U.S./
NATO did in Kosovo in 1999, when they split Kosovo from Serbian Yugoslavia.
H. U.S. & NATO-backed Ukrainian
armed forces, including neo-fascist units, are waging a proxy war in
Donbass against the Russian ethnic population there. The neo-fascist Azov Legion has been
incorporated into the Ukrainian army.
Anti-Jewish incidents in Ukraine
are the highest in Europe.
I. The legal Russian intervention in Syria overturned another regime change
project by the U.S.
security state. It led to the defeat of
Daesh and of jihadist groups backed by the Saudis, like Al-Nusra and the
polyglot “Free” Syrian Army. At present,
it ‘seems’ to be protecting the Syrian Kurds from a Turkish invasion of Syria.
J. NATO’s military role in the world since the
fall of the USSR
has been disastrous. It started
‘mildly’ with the bloody bombing and breakup of Yugoslavia. Then amped up with
invasions and occupations of Afghanistan
and Iraq, the destruction of
Libya, the failed regime change plan in Syria and now the
destabilization of Ukraine
and Georgia.
K. What Cohen calls ‘media malpractice’
by the New York Times and the Washington Post and their echo chambers at CNN,
MSNBC, NPR & PBS has made the thinly or falsely sourced Russiagate story a
page one, 24-hour headline for years. It
is a clear example of a full-on propaganda offensive.
L. Obama stopped negotiations over
nuclear issues like ‘no first strike’ and MAD, then passed a massive and
expensive ‘updating’ of U.S.
nuclear forces in 2016.
M. Trump unilaterally left another nuclear
treaty, the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2018, a goal of the
national security state and neo-cons like John Bolton.
N. Continuing economic warfare sanctions
to ‘isolate’ Russia passed by Obama and Trump are viewed by Europeans as actually
preventing Russian products from the European market, in favor of U.S. ones.
The Resistance in league with ...the Pentagon? |
That is the story of the U.S.
initiated and amplified new Cold War against Russia. These are some of Cohen’s more general points
below:
1. There
are various forces in the Kremlin and Putin is actually more pro-Europe/U.S. than hardliners
who do not trust the U.S. or Europe
in any shape or form. He has shown far
more restraint in Syria for
instance, where Russian planes were shot down, soldiers killed and airbases
bombed by U.S.
forces.
2. Putin is actually more of a statesman than nearly
anyone in the U.S.
government and is able to get agreements between hostile countries – like the Iran
deal. Obama played a diplomatic but vacillating role,
as he too responded to pressure from the U.S. security state.
3. Trump’s discussions with Russia ‘were’ and ‘are’ normal
procedures for presidents since Eisenhower, including pre-election contacts.
4. Hysterical ‘traitor’ talk floods the media
after condemnations issued by former or present CIA or FBI sources like
Brennan, Comey & Clapper. These
actors are not part of a ‘deep state’ – they are part of a very public national
security state, which has been obvious since Wilson
sent troops into Russia
to defeat the Soviet revolution in 1918. Glenn Greenwald at The Intercept took their arguments apart in
his analysis of what Constitutional ‘treason’ legally means.
5. Russia’s
economic outlook was to have a good trading relationship with the EU and even
the U.S. So the idea that Russia is ‘attacking western
democratic values’ makes no sense to their economic plans. They have recently signed deals with Merkel
and Macron.
6. Putin has much more support in Russia (77% in last election) than new
cold-warrior Hillary Clinton had in the U.S. Her political line was revealed early, in August
2016 when she called Trump “Putin’s puppet’ at an electoral debate, long before the propaganda offensive reached its peak, but indicative of the future angle to be taken.
7. Cohen questions the allegation that Democratic
e-mails were ‘hacked‘ instead of being an inside job. He also questions the Steele dossier and the
national security assessment that was not issued by 17 intelligence
agencies. He also briefly looks at the Skripal, Nemtsov, Politkovskya and
Litvinenko cases. He calls all of this ‘Intelgate.’ Convictions so far in the investigation into Russiagate are
all about other issues. In all this, he
says there is no actual way to prove that the Russians swayed the election.
8. The list of hysterical insults by prominent
Democrats and some Republicans against Russia or Putin is long and
off-base. “Crime of the Century,” “another 9/11;” “Pearl Harbor,” “We are at
war,” “Trump-Putin axis,” “the Red Menace of Vladimir Putin’s Russia,” and
“fascist Putin” are all quotes from U.S. politicians The latter insult is especially incorrect, as
Russia actually played the main role in DEFEATING fascism in WWII.
9. Cohen does not talk about money-laundering, bribes, quid pro quos or
Trump’s building projects in Moscow
or loans from Russians to his companies. Cohen does not ‘follow the money.’ This corrupt behavior is similar what other
capitalist corporations in the world do. Corruption is endemic to international capital, no matter what FinCen rules say. Look at the treatment of the money-laundering bank HSBC, for instance.
10. Cohen
counters the inaccurate ‘neo-Stalinist’ verbiage about Putin by mentioning the
recent establishment of both a state-sponsored museum and a memorial in Moscow to the victims of the Stalinist gulag.
11. Neo-McCarthyism in the U.S. has returned in Democratic and Republican attacks
on anyone who disagrees with the national security state line on Russia.
12. Since 1991 and the fall of the USSR, Russia
has been treated by triumphalist and ‘indispensable’ U.S. politicians as a defeated and
inconsequential nation.
The hostility to Russia and China
(and Iran/Venezuela/Cuba/Syria/N Korea and …) is being manufactured by the U.S. ruling class as it attempts to
increase its failing imperial control of the whole world. If you do not understand imperialism, then you
cannot understand world politics. This
book, while only pro-détente, will help.
Other prior reviews on this
subject, below: “Coleen Rowley,” “Doublespeak,” US/EU Meddling,” “Why Are U.S. Oil
Prices Dropping,” “Dressed Up For a Riot,” “Soviet Fates and Lost
Alternatives,” (Cohen); “Look at the War-Monger Facts.” Use blog search box, upper left.
P.S. - Link to Intercept article published today on resignation of William Arkin as reporter, related to national security state role in present media: https://theintercept.com/2019/01/03/veteran-nbcmsnbc-journalist-blasts-the-network-for-being-captive-to-the-national-security-state-and-reflexively-pro-war-to-stop-trump/
P.P.S. - and then there are the crickets in Cuba... more anti-Russian disinformation debunked.
PPPS - "+ Even the Washington Post seems to have thrown in the
towel. In an underplayed story by Philip Bump, the paper concedes that the
Russian SM trolling operation during the 2016 election wasn’t “sophisticated,
specific or targeted.” This was obvious to anyone who took even 10
minutes to actually look at the ads…anyone but Rachel Maddow, that is." – Jeffrey St. Clair, 1/11/2019
PPPPS - 12/21, Re: #10 above, Putin and his courts will close Memorial and imprison its director for 15 years on trumped up charges.
And I bought it at May Day
Books!
Red Frog
January 4, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment