The Only Political Question
that Matters?
You can’t avoid it. The presidential election. Everywhere you turn on the media, endless
discussion of a reactionary racist billionaire and a war-mongering Wall Street
clone. It's 'close'! It's 'close!' Who to choose? Who to choose? Such a dilemma!
The fact that the falsely
‘democratic’ electoral system in the U.S.
has given us this choice shows that U.S. capitalism’s façade is really dropping. It is as paper-thin as it has been in
80 years. Two frankly reactionary
candidates, each with their own severe problems that can’t be wiped away by
rationalizations, has to give even the smarter members of the ruling class pause. Why do the majority of people call themselves
‘independents,’ in spite of years of propaganda for the Democrats or the Republicans?
Why do so few people vote in elections?
The last one in 2014 had the lowest turnout in history. In the last round of Party primaries in 2016 less
than 10% of the people voted. Why do these two candidates have the lowest
‘positive’ ratings in history? All of
this expresses a profound disassociation with this imitation democracy by a majority of the population.
Then there are the
structural problems. In elections,
incumbents almost always win. Money has an inordinate finger on the scale. Districts are absurdly gerrymandered to the
point that Republicans have far more seats than Democrats, even though they
have fewer voters. Voter suppression,
since first being exposed in the 2000 election in Florida, has become even more widespread,
especially with the destruction of the Voting Rights act by the undemocratic
‘Supreme’ Court. Even the Constitution limits
actual democracy - the Senate is inherently anti-democratic and the Electoral
College as well. Winner-take-all election
rules, which mitigate against other parties, are the overwhelming legal rule. 3rd parties are castigated for
being ‘spoilers,’ not for promoting democratic choice. You are spoiling the ruling class
machine! Hacking voting machines is
current practice. Wall-to-wall propaganda coverage from cable, network
television, public radio, corporate newspapers and websites all back up the same
corporate messages. The list goes on and seems to be getting worse.
Yet the political context is
even more sinister. Anyone who rejects
an electoral charade in which the population is expected to believe the
utterings of these laughable candidates, just as new-born babes trust their
mothers, is ignored. We are to vote our ostensible identity and our pocketbooks without thinking,
even though neither candidate actually cares about the working class – which
is the majority across all ethnicities, nationalities and genders.
In reality, it is the
current lie of democracy that is being exposed – a situation that bodes ill for
the future of this ‘democracy.’ It is becoming clearer – even to non-Marxists
- that we do not have a real democracy.
We have a rhetorical democracy.
We have an oligarchy with two wings, running two different parties with
tactical differences. To “Occupy the
Democrats” is like getting a suite at the Waldorf Astoria for free. It is a fantasy, and always has been.
The supporters of Trump are
actually much higher-bracket Republicans than the press lets on, as his real base is white small businessmen and the self-employed. His xenophobic, racist and sexist campaign
brings to mind the Italian reactionary billionaire blowhard Silvio Berlusconi –
not Adolph Hitler. Right-wing demagogues
have a long history in the U.S.,
so Trump is not something completely new.
Even so, large segments of the Republican capitalist class and their
politicians are rejecting him and supporting Clinton. Even neo-conservatives are flocking to Clinton, including Bush I, who has joined that club. Perhaps it is Trump's reluctance to make war on Russia? People wonder where Trump came from. Political characters like Trump are using
politics that have been embedded in prior party platforms for years, just putting them on steroids. Like the wall to keep out Mexicans? Already built by both Democrats and
Republicans and ... the Israeli government, but the latter for Palestinians. Deportations? Massive practice even now. And so on.
Trump ‘says’ he wants to
take it up to a whole new level, but the capitalist handlers in the deep state and the military
will have a sit-down talk with Trump if he wins and let him know how far he can
go. Or else.
What created Trump? The whole 40-year move to the right by the
U.S. ruling class, which has ignored poverty, criminalized non-whites, deprived
workers of jobs, sidelined unions and lowered wages. Ultimately the hidden enabler is a Democratic
Party that has collaborated with Republicans on many economic and political issues
– though not all, as there are still tactical splits. And that is why the Democrats are the ‘more effective evil,’
as Black Agenda Report describes them, preparing the ground for this vicious
billionaire. Continuing the tactic of backing a Wall Street supporting, incarceration-state loving, war-mongering
Democrat only guarantees that the next Republican candidate might be even more effectively
right-wing. Both parties leave the
majority – the working class – with little but empty phrases. The “green” of money is the real identity we
should keep track of. Following the ‘green’ is
the only way out of this mess to understand who are our real enemies and our
real allies.
I must comment on the
personal proclivities of Clinton
supporters. Clinton called Trump’s base 50% ‘deplorables’
at a $250K a plate fundraiser. You can imagine THAT audience was not
exactly on the front lines of the ‘freedom struggle.’ “Racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic,
Islamophobic” as the chant goes. You’d
think Hilary was a real leftist with that, right? Au contraire.
Trump actually used the phrase ‘working-class’ to counter her attack on
his base, though some of it was certainly true. Trump attracts bigots like shit attracts flies, but not all his supporters are bigots. In a way, this was Clinton's version of Romney's '47%' statement.
Lets look at Clinton’s reality about
these issues. Does she have a
government-funded program to get rid of poverty and unemployment? No.
Has she decided to back off the military up-arming of the police? No. Has she come out clearly for marijuana
legalization and against the incarceration state? No. Has
she decided to reinstate AFDC? No. Has she backed off the privatization and
re-segregation of charter schools?
No. Is there a program of paid
government child-care in the works?
No. Or promotion of unions in
mostly female workplaces? No. Has she pledged to get rid of discriminatory
laws against gay people in the 29 states that allow businesses to fire
you for being gay? No. Will she stop proclaiming "America" the essential country? No. Will she restrain herself from a warring on Russia? No. Will she refrain from arming ‘moderate’ jihadis
or bombing another Middle-eastern or African country full of Muslims? Or pulling the FBI off their practice of
‘terror’ stings in the Muslim community?
No. It is all hot air designed to
fool the credulous, just as Trump’s attempts to pretend he is some kind of
working-class hero to whites is a complete fraud.
They are both frauds because
it is essential to lie to voters when you actually represent monied interests.
In actuality support for Clinton by Democratic
Party loyalists is a form of preserving the status quo. These people do not really want to change
anything - they just fear that things might get worse for them. For those who are in the
labor movement or the working class, it is self-deception on a very personal
level because they know that Clinton will do little for them, and Trump also. Now you may chose to vote for the Clinton
wing of the capitalist class as a more rational alternative – but understand clearly
what you are doing. Don’t dress it up with pretty phrases about ‘fighting
racism’ and the rest. Just admit to
yourself: “I back this group of rich people more. I don’t care about
fundamental change."
'Lesser Evilism' is a permanent strategy in which the ruling elite limits any challenge to their two parties. It is permanent because there will never be a time when there is not a supposed 'greater evil.' Every election is always 'crucial' in this way - from LBJ/Goldwater on down. So in essence it says, 'shut up and get in line...forever." It is essentially politically totalitarian.
'Lesser Evilism' is a permanent strategy in which the ruling elite limits any challenge to their two parties. It is permanent because there will never be a time when there is not a supposed 'greater evil.' Every election is always 'crucial' in this way - from LBJ/Goldwater on down. So in essence it says, 'shut up and get in line...forever." It is essentially politically totalitarian.
Words mean something, but
actual policies mean more. It is the structural
aspects of racism, sexism, homophobia and denigration of Middle-Easterners
that need to be addressed, not just reciting clichés about identity. It is these
structural aspects that materially maintain the actual experience of
oppression, and continue the process of making ‘identity’ real in a capitalist
society.
If Trump wins the election,
this country will be up for grabs, as a good chunk of the population will go on
a ‘war’ footing against him - and that is all to the good. If Clinton
II wins, things will go on as before, though the right will also go on a 'war' footing - but it might be something more violent then before. The rightist development of the "Tea Party" into the "Alt Right" might lead to proto-fascist attacks on forces like Black Lives Matter and others. This should be met with force if it occurs. The NYT, Wall Street,
the corporate media and the majority of the capitalist class is hoping and betting on the Clinton option
2 as the smoother choice for them. However a split like this in the bourgeoisie makes capital very vulnerable. For the
working class, neither candidate is acceptable.
And so the revolution in the U.S. advances on tiny,
many-millioned mouse feet.
Red Frog
September 25, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment