“Propaganda,” by Edward Bernays, with an introduction by Mark
Crispin Miller, 1928/2005
This book, a classic 1928 primer on media manipulation, is
one of the origins of Noam Chomsky’s “manufacture of consent.” This phrase was first
used by Walter Lippman, who was one of Edward Bernays’ heroes. Bernays is a
product of early U.S. 20th century positivism, an atmosphere of
ostensible science, uplift, moderation, intelligence and expertise. In this thin book, Bernays in essence sells
the job of the ‘public relations counsel’ to American and even international political campaigns, the
government and corporations as something as necessary as corporate legal
counsel. And nowadays, everyone has one
- so he won that argument.
The term ‘propaganda’ originated long ago in an office of
the Catholic Church, and until World War I, it had a relatively straightforward
meaning. However, after that war, in
which deceptive government propaganda was used to entice Americans to support a
horrible slaughter, the term fell into disrepute. Remember ‘the war to end all wars’ and ‘the
war for democracy’ and ’Huns’ and ’Prussian barbarism?’ Those were propaganda phrases. Nowadays, even when using propagandistic
methods, no corporation or government ever admits to it. That was for the “Russians,” you see. “Americans” never do that.
Mark Miller points out that Bernays own record had its ups
and downs. He finally abandoned work for
tobacco companies in the 1970s when the toxic effects of tobacco were finally
well known, but he also promoted the 1953 invasion of Guatemala for
United Fruit, as well as selling a lot of Lucky Strikes before that.
In theory, the question is, what predominates – appearance
or material fact? Many leftists believe
that the ruling class will always be in power due to their massive propaganda
apparatus, which extends through newspapers, TV, radio, magazines and into the
internet. Most Marxists, on the other
hand, do not believe that illusions are permanent if material facts continue to
contradict them. Statistics show that
decreasing numbers of Americans believe the government, journalists,
corporations, political parties, religions or advertising tell the truth anymore. This slow, quantitative drip can someday turn
into something else, if actual, real conditions don’t change. False consciousness, which the U.S. is
swimming in, only works as a temporary palliative. Of course, how long that period is, is up for
argument.
Bernays actually does call the secret manipulators of public
opinion an ‘invisible government.’ His
exact quote? “The conscious and
intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is
an important element in a democratic society.
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an
invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” While being homey about his examples of
successful propaganda campaigns – around the use of velvet in clothing, or
dramatic hats for women (he uses a lot of fashion examples), repeated
references to cooking classes put forward by baking companies, soap
sculpturing, art competitions, physician recommendations, piano spaces or radio
programs about cars, the essential ‘plutocratic’ perspective comes through time
and time again. Bernays, again, and I
quote: “Democracy, therefore, requires a
supra-governmental body of detached professionals to sift the data, think
things through, and keep the national enterprise from blowing up or come
crashing to a halt.” So if you are too
busy to pay attention to social reality, and like some ‘expert’ to do your
thinking about finance, politics, the environment or what restaurant to eat at
tonight, Bernays is your man. After all,
Johnny has a toothache.
Bernays is not a reactionary. He approves of the strides women had made;
and distains the propaganda of the Ku Klux Klan. But then, “When the example of the leader is
not at hand, and the herd has to think for itself, it does so by means of
clichés, pat words or images …” “Good government can be sold to a community
just as any other commodity can be sold.”
Or... “Recently, the word ‘Bolshevik’ has performed a similar service for persons who wished to frighten the public
away from a line of action.” Worked for
awhile, didn’t it?
Economically, he makes the statement that, “today,
supply must actively seek to create its corresponding demand.” They don’t teach that at the University of Chicago . He turns one of the great clichés
of bourgeois economics on its head.
The key line, I think, is his thought that, “some think ... propaganda
will tend to defeat itself as its mechanism becomes obvious to the public. My opinion is that it will not … unless the
propaganda is untrue or unsocial.”
Unfortunately for Bernays, so much propaganda is just that. The recent flood of negative presidential campaign ads unleashed in U.S. 'swing states' can be counter-productive, as what they tell the viewer is that neither candidate has anything to offer. At some point, it is very possible that viewers will turn off the ads.
I would argue that the internet and other media are right
now breaking down a unified propaganda message by the ruling class. Opinions not allowed on the network news get
a hearing on the internet. Most people are not watching the U.S. network
news anymore, unless they are in their 60s and above - witness the multiple ads for geriatric products on those shows. The audience for the fake-liberal version of
the network news NPR is also aging. However,
that is also why some corporations are attempting to create a ‘two-track’
internet, and governments censor their internet, or use it to further perfect
their police state.
And I bought it at May Day Books!
Red Frog
September 20, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment